Finally, good news.
http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/fueling_the_network_effect :
And by now, you've seen that's exactly what we've done. We've followed through on our promise to join hands with the free software community, and have chosen the Free Software Foundation's General Public License (known as "the GPL") as the governing license for the evolution of the Java platform. (Crow and hats available for those needing a snack :-) The GPL is the same license used to manage the evolution of GNU/Linux - in choosing the GPL, we've opened the door to comingling the communities, and the code itself. (And yes, we picked GPL version 2 - version 3 isn't available, but we like where the FSF is headed.)
Later:
By admitting that one of the strongest motivations to select the GPL was the announcement made last week by Novell and Microsoft, suggesting that free and open source software wasn't safe unless a royalty was being paid. As an executive from one of those companies said, "free has to have a price."
That's nonsense.
Free software can be free of royalties, and free of impediments to broadscale, global adoption and deployment. Witness what we've done with Solaris, and now, what we've done with Java. Developers are free to pick up the code, and create derivatives. Without royalty or obligation.
Those that say open source software can't be safe for customers - or that commercially indemnified software can't foster community - are merely advancing their own agenda. Without any basis in fact.
They're also fighting a rising tide.
Discussion (5)Last update: 2006-11-13 (Rev 9273)